I have some major qualms with the MTA. This hasn’t been so much a recent development, as a growing disdain over the last dozen years or so. I love the subway when it works. It’s quick, it’s efficient and it’s the cheapest way to get around. Sometimes you even get a new car that doesn’t smell like homeless man or break your eardrums. That is a very special day. But this is not always the case. Have you ever tried to get the G train from Queens to Williamsburg? It seems so simple but somehow two hours later you have ended up neither in Queens or Brooklyn. It runs on weekends, it only runs on weekdays, it goes backwards to go forwards, it only runs at night, it doesn’t run past 11PM, it goes local, it goes express. Huh? Well I certainly don’t know. I can’t imagine what will happen in the face of a budget cut.
I don’t agree with putting tolls on the East Side bridges to help eschew budget cuts. I agree it is not very eco-friendly for people to drive to work, but they probably have no better option. So many sections of the outer boroughs are completely devoid of public transportation that routes to work or school could take two hours, involving any combination of buses, subways, LIRR, taxis, and ferries. Not only is it exhausting but it’s not practical to travel two hours to and from work or school everyday. Instead of taxing these people for crossing a river within their own city, I think it would be more efficient to give them another alternative.There are express buses that run from the Bronx, Queens and Brooklyn, but they cost 2.5x as much as a regular fare. Can you explain the logic behind not building subway lines in the outer boroughs to save money and then providing those commuters with an alternative but charging them more for it and then wanting to charge them an additional tax when they want to drive to work? Oh the backwards musings of the MTA….There has to be a better solution than that.
On the other hand, if the senators in Albany don’t vote to help the MTA, everyone suffers. Millions of people ride the subway each day and any form of service cut or impairment in the repair and construction of the old and crumbling system quickly becomes disastrous. But what I want to know, is who is in charge of the accounting department over at the Metropolitan Transit Authority? They must have been awarded their CPA outside a crack den in the village in the 70’s. On November 17, 2005, Sewell Chan wrote in the NYTimes:
In February, it was $76 million. In July, it ballooned to $833 million. Yesterday, the Metropolitan Transportation Authority announced its third - and, it hopes, final - estimate for the size of its surplus this year: $1.044 billion…The authority does not expect its good fortune - soaring proceeds from real estate taxes and unusually low interest rates - to last. It anticipates a net deficit of $152 million in 2007, rising to $934 million in 2009, and that projection assumes fare and toll increases in both years.
It seems as though the MTA knew they would be totally bankrupt back in 2005. Were they in on something we are not, or were they going to beg for money regardless of the current housing crisis and economic collapse? Where did all of this money go? One second they have a deficit, the next they miscalculated the deficit by a couple million dollars and they have a surplus and the next year they are in a major deficit again. How do they come up with these numbers? I feel like they just watch Yolanda Vega pull the Lotto numbers and decide if they want to make it millions or billions on the plus side or in the red.
I don’t know what the answer is, but I would be pretty pissed if the monthly metro card increased to over $100. So if you have thoughts or feelings about the issue, visit http://keepnewyorkmoving.org/ and share your thoughts with Governor Patterson.